Shop Mobile More Submit  Join Login
  • Mood: Repulsed
  • Drinking: Water
I'm sorry guys, but I need to post this. I'm in the mood to rant.
I might lose a few watchers after this, but I don't really give a shit.
I've been put in a pissy mood today, so I figured it's the best time to get my feelings out about one particular subject: CGI Chipmunks.
I can never post my full opinion on them anywhere, because I don't want to get into trouble or offend anyone. But this is MY dA account, so I can post MY opinion and it won't matter.
I absolutely, with all my heart, DESPISE CGI Chipmunks. There is nothing in this fandom more revolting(other than, say, chipmunks turned into humans).
It's absolutely impossible to express how much I hate them.
CGI RUINED The Chipmunks and Chipettes.
What did they do? They took the characters we all loved and slapped fur on them and made them tiny and fucked up their eye colors and destroyed their personalities.
Here is a list of reasons I hate CGI:
1. Eye colors. This is a HUGE issue for me. Bigger than anything. HUGE. I FUCKING HATE WHAT THEY DID TO ALVIN, JEANETTE, AND ELEANOR'S EYE COLORS IN THE CGI MOVIES. Alvin is supposed to have BLUE eyes, not BROWN. BLUE. I ADORE Alvin's blue eyes. Jeanette needs green eyes, not purple. That's not even a natural eye color! Nobody has purple eyes! That's like saying they should give Alvin red eyes and Brittany pink eyes. Just...just...ew. Eleanor's eyes are supposed to be brown, not green. They made CGI Eleanor even more like Theodore than she already was.
Which brings me to my next ranting subject, Eleanor.
2. Eleanor in CGI. Okay, what the FUCK did they do with my little badass Chipette who don't take no shit? Oh, she's 'bubbly' and 'innocent' now? So she's Theodore with pigtails? Alright then, fuck you. There is SO much wrong with Eleanor in CGI. They killed her personality. She might as well not even be in the CGI movies, because that sure as hell isn't Eleanor. In The Squeakuel, with the whole 'you need to work on being taller' thing, Eleanor would never take that! She'd stand up for herself. She wouldn't take Ian's shit. Where did she go? Why is she so innocent and lame now? Why is she just like Theodore? Why? WHY? THIS IS WHY SO MANY PEOPLE THINK THE CHIPETTES ARE JUST FEMALE CLONES OF THE CHIPMUNKS.
3. The Chipettes. I already ranted about Eleanor, because she deserved her own rant bubble to make up for how much they screwed with her, but Brittany and Jeanette aren't all that untampered with either. Brittany is known for her bitchiness. I want bitchy Brittany. That's why I like her, that's her personality. She's a bitch. She should always be a bitch who will do anything to win. That's how she is. Sure, she had her sweet moments in the cartoon, but that doesn't change the fact that she would do anything to be on top, to be in the spotlight. She came back a little in Chipwrecked, but she still wasn't the Brittany I know. I want her back. And Jeanette, poor, sweet Jeanette. She didn't deserve to be fucked with like that. One of the few lines she said in The Squeakuel pisses me off more than ANYTHING on this EARTH. "I'm Jeanette, but sometimes I feel more like an Olivia." <---What the fuck is this? Seriously, what the fuck? That doesn't make any sense. What the fuck is it supposed to even mean? I don't get it. And they took away her clumsiness. Jeanette was known for that, where is it?
4. Simon's nose. I tell you, Simon's nose in CGI annoys the crap out of me. It's so big and...ugly. Even back before I was really into The Chipmunks and had never seen much of the cartoon, when watching the CGI, Simon was still my favorite, but I still hated his nose. Seriously, what the heck is up with it? It's disgusting.
5. The lame jokes in the first movie. Okay, I hate the first CGI movie above them all because they look the stupidest in it AND because of the lame jokes. Eating poop, a raisin, REALLY? REALLY? Is that supposed to be funny? Because it isn't, it's gross. So is Alvin farting in Dave's face.
6. Alvin's cap. .....................Okay, The Alvin Seville I know never goes anywhere without his trusty red baseball cap. Heck, there's even an episode of the cartoon where he goes batshit crazy when he looses it, so why would anyone want to take it away from him? Alvin isn't Alvin without his cap. Sure, there are those like, two minutes at the end of one of the movies where he has it on, but that's the end and they didn't bring it back. He even has it on some of the hideously ugly posters they have for them. So why? Why isn't it there? Why did you take one of the things that makes him Alvin?
7. The Chipmunks backstory. Okay, I fucking hate the whole "Our parents were hippies, they left early to join a commune." thing. That is NOT what happened. Why did they fuck with the adorable backstory that they had in the cartoon? I adore Vinny, and taking her away and giving her this...IMAGE, annoys the hell out of me. The Chipmunks were supposed to be abandoned as babies because their mother couldn't take care of them because of the harsh weather. Their parents did NOT leave them because they were hippies. That's really, really, exceedingly stupid.
8. Alvin and Simon's ages. Okay, any cartoon fan knows that Alvin is the oldest by 5 minutes. There is proof here, in one of my favorite clips: www.youtube.com/watch?v=6lEXuk… . In the CGI movies, apparently, Simon is oldest by one: fc09.deviantart.net/fs71/f/201… . What the fuck, man? Why would they do that? Alvin is supposed to be the oldest. His personality goes great with that fact. Why would they I change that? Why?
9. The models they use on posters, products, etc; These aren't the same ones they use in the movies, and they're always in awkward, stupid poses. They never do look right. In a lot of them they took human hands and upper bodies and added fur onto them and stuck one of the 'munks heads on there. It looks so...WRONG. and out of proportion. I tell you, these people are HORRIBLE at photoshop. Take this poster for example: www.filmofilia.com/wp-content/… Notice Alvin's arms, especially. They are human arms. They don't match, and they look stupid. He's the worst off in that one, but the rest of them are like that too. And this one too: 2.bp.blogspot.com/-qqKmr9HLn_w… Seriously, what the heck? It's so fucking ugly. They aren't even that ugly in the movies.
10. The way they look. Sigh, if only they weren't so small and ugly and rodent looking. If only they didn't have tails and stupid looking fur and lame outfits and eye colors and stupid faces and had their butts hanging out of their clothes. Oh well, we can dream, can't we?

EDIT ADDING MORE RANTING:
SIMON IS NOT FUCKING STUPID WHY DID HE GIVE DAVE A FUCKING PAPERCLIP COMPASS WTF THAT SOUNDS LIKE SOMETHING THEODORE WOULD DO FUCKING UGH. /endrant
Add a Comment:
 
:iconxmysterywomanx:
xMysteryWomanx Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Omg I love you
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Thank you! xD
Reply
:iconxmysterywomanx:
xMysteryWomanx Featured By Owner Jul 11, 2013  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Your welcome and I feel you lol :) They took the chipmunks we know and made them fake
Reply
:iconpepsi-rabbit:
Pepsi-Rabbit Featured By Owner May 26, 2013  Student Digital Artist
AMEN SISTER!
Personally I thought Simon was oldest just because I never saw the whole series since it's hard to find. I also didn't know about their mother, so thank you for informing me! I knew they were abandoned, I just didn't know their mother's name.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner May 26, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Grounded Chipmunk and A Chipmunk Reunion are both online. Grounded Chipmunk is actually partially still on the official Chipmunks.com website in the video section I believe. You're welcome. :)
Reply
:iconpepsi-rabbit:
Pepsi-Rabbit Featured By Owner May 26, 2013  Student Digital Artist
Thanks~! ^^
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Sorry, I ment to say "backbone"...
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Oh and this video makes me wanna say "DAMN IT ALVIN, MAN UP YOU'RE THE OLDEST FOR CRYING OUT LOUD!!!! Show some backmone":laughing:
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Woooooooooooaaaahhh...! I... I never knew... :laughing:No wonder WHY Jordy said you hate CGI, I'd be pissed TOO if I was in a cartoon and someone makes ME into a DOG...! Well, regardless of the 2 versions they can still SING right...! I mean... It's NOT about the looks of the characters that matter, OR how they did the HISTORIES of them. Most times some people just don't want the 3 movies to turn out like the CARTOON right! But I KNOW how you feel about this, I was a bit upset about it back when I found out about the VERY first commercial of it when they FIRST showed it on TV. I was all like... "WHAT THE FUCK-WHAT THE FUCK-WHAT THE FUCK-WHAT THE FUCK!!!!" But after about 4 months... I learned that it wasn't all bad, they JUST didn't wanna copy off the cartoon ya know? But I won't judge you about how you think of them, so I don't judge ANYONE about how they make things now so I just LTA and MMOB and shit so I can make mu OWN version of things like... A Video-Game called "A&TC: CARTOONS v,s CGI" but with 43% of blood-shed in it:laighing: Good idea no?
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
I honestly have no idea what the heck you're trying to say...
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Oh and I somehow ran into this...[link]
I don't know if you approve on this, but it's pretty goddamn FUNNY!:rofl: This is too fucking ritch, Eleanor the wife of Theodore has gone PSYCHO!!!!:rofl:
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
What I'm saying is, CGI isn't all that bad. Mix Arther with the real world and you get a GCI arther that's an animal too.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
A CGI Arthur would be terrifying..he'd look like an actual aardvark. Those things are hideous.
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
There's nothing wrong with a "CGI-Scooby Doo" is there? Because they already made something like that too.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Of course, The Scooby Doo movies are somewhat entertaining, but he looks stupid and the cartoon is much better. At least they somewhat tried to stay true to his design, though.
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
I'll say, even if they didn't do it all the way I still give it a 10 out of 10.^^;
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Yix...! Well again I won't judge you, would you mind coming to my Profile with me for a bit? I wanna show you something. Oh and... You can bring Simon, Jordy, and Theo if you want, I won't mind the extra company.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
How about no?
Reply
:iconjaid-shadow:
JAID-SHADOW Featured By Owner Apr 23, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Alright I'll show you some other time, but it's something you might enjoy.
Reply
:icondesmondekapi:
DesmondeKapi Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Student Traditional Artist
90% of CGI transitions from cartoon to CGI animals/beings/things suck.

Where the Wild Things Are. I like. XD
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Feb 7, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Amen.

I've never seen it, although I never much liked Where the Wild Things Are in the first place. xD
Reply
:iconthebritettechipettes:
Can we please talk about how much they ruined Simon. Completely. Just all of his personality, gone.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
SERIOUSLY!
He seemed so...stupid. And his comments on that maid in the first movie are SO not Simon.
Reply
:iconthebritettechipettes:
I think we'd get along just fine.
Completely fine.
My distaste for the CGI Chipmunks is well developed by now and reading this just made it triple.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jan 18, 2013  Hobbyist General Artist
Yes. xD
Good, haha.
Reply
:iconcedarwoods:
CedarWoods Featured By Owner Jul 12, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I appreciate both versions for different reasons, but I do agree that they fucked them up in some ways regarding CGI.

1. I totally agree with everything you said about Eleanor. I love her CGI's cute giggle, but where is the strong sports playing Ellie we all know and love. I mean they're basically saying that a girl can't be sweet and bitchy at the same time. Contrary to popular belief, it is actually Ellie who is the bitch. According to my mother, bitch is actually a commonly misunderstood word. It actually means a girl or woman who doesn't take any shit. I suppose Brittany can be a bitch at times too (and I'm not saying there aren't mean bitches), but cartoon Ellie is the true bitch of the Chipettes. I wouldn't say it to anyone (since I know that it's a commonly misunderstood word) but if some jerk-off tries to put you down by calling you a bitch, just thank him and walk away.

2. I agree somewhat with your rant about Jeanette. I sort of wonder what happened to her clumsiness too. The only thing I can imagine, is that since they're supposed to be older in the CGI version, perhaps they figured that she would have grown out of it. Still, I think it would have been fun to see her trip on her tail or put her jacket on backwards at least once. Also, in regards to purple eyes, someone told me that it's not impossible (although it is extremely rare).

3. As to Alvin's cap, I did find the lack of that a little odd (he was totally obsessed with the thing in the cartoon version). The only excuse I can think of for this, is that there must have been some aspect of it, that was difficult to animate all the time. If not, than I don't know why they got rid of it.

4. I thought that Simon was less sarcastic in the CGI movies. I've only seen what episodes are available on Youtube, plus A Chipmunk Christmas, but Simon's sarcasm is what I enjoyed about him.

5. I agree that the first movie was the worst of the 3. The saving grace for me was David Cross ("So what did you get them?" "Savings bonds." "Great. Just what every kid dreams of." Tickles me every time). I do consider the 2nd one to be one of the best sequels (sorry I meant Squeakquels to a kids movie ever) and the third one was cute (especially the romance between Jen and Si), but except for a couple lines, I totally hate the first one.

6. To be fair however, the cartoons are not completely faultless. For one thing they never seemed to grow up past the age of ten or eleven (I base this on the two times their birthdays were mentioned, and the fact that they eventually looked a bit older). In the CGI versions, they do appear to be getting a bit older as the movies progress. The Chipmunk Adventure, is a wild ride of animation mistakes and sexism. Did we really need to see Ellie's underwear that much. I mean I'm sure it was quite thrilling for the other Chipmunks in the audience, but I have no interest in seeing Eleanor's ass. And watch the scene when the girls discover that the dolls are filled with cash and diamonds. Do you notice something wrong there? I don't think Ross and Janice think children are stupid, so there must have been some other reason for having the constant barrage of animation mistakes. As to Ellie's panties, I would understand it if it only happened a few times, but it was constant (thank God they never got breasts in the cartoon, or else they would have Ellie's shirt constantly falling open to show off her bra).


So I think both versions have their benefits and shortcomings.


Cheers
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 12, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I don't feel it's necessary to elaborate on the other points you've mentioned, but I'd like to speak for the animation mistakes in The Chipmunk Adventure.
It has nothing to do with them thinking kids are stupid. The many animation mistakes in that movie are due to the fact that Ross and Janice paid for that out of their own budget, their director quit, Janice had to become the director(while she was pregnant, buying a house, and doing most of the voices in the movie), and they had a short amount of time to get the movie done, so they had to have people around the world animate it. I think that's plenty of excuse, don't you?
As for the underwear thing, if you look at a lot of movies made around that time(the 80s, mainly) with cute little girls you'll notice that people thought it was cute to have panty shots of them. Take "All Dogs Go To Heaven", for example.
Reply
:iconcedarwoods:
CedarWoods Featured By Owner Jul 15, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Well that does seem like a good excuse. It certainly sounds like Janice was busy during production. I've always thought the Chipettes didn't get enough time in the original series. If they ever make a new Chipmunk series, I would hope that they make a spinoff series that focused mainly on the Chipettes.

As to the panty shot thing (and I've never seen "All Dogs Go To Heaven") I still sort of get a disturbed feeling from it. It just sort of feels a little like some cheap way for creeps to get off. Maybe it's not. I don't trust a lot of guys though.

If you compare gals and guys, you gals are going to win every time in my book.
No woman that I'm aware of ever started any war or genocide. Women weren't the ones who decided to dump toxic chemicals into the rivers and oceans. If you ask me, the fewer guys there are running around mucking things up, the nicer a world you gals will have. I don't hate all men, I know some really great guys in the world, but it's mostly the men who commit the really awful crimes against society.


Cheers

PS: Strange how things can veer off like that isn't it?
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 15, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
The Chipettes get plenty of screen time, in my opinion. The Chipmunk Adventure, even, seems to focus a lot more on them. There are a ton of episodes of the series that focus on them alone, some of which don't even have the boys in them at all.

I think it's rather creepy as well, but it was a thing at the time, I suppose.

Interesting opinion you have there. Of course there are a ton of "deadly women" out there too.
Reply
:iconcedarwoods:
CedarWoods Featured By Owner Jul 15, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I'm aware of the episodes that focused only on the girls, but I still think that they didn't get enough screen-time (but maybe that's just my opinion).

I don't think men getting off on little girls was just a thing of that time. They're have always been men like that.

Of course I'm not saying that women are perfect (although I do think they're better than men). I'm aware that there are women who commit nasty acts (David Pelzer's mother in "A Child Called It" for example was pure evil). But I think we can both safely say that when it comes to huge horrific events, that the original idea probably came from a guy.

To all guys who might read this, I don't think us men are all evil, just enough of us to really mess things up. I have an idea, let's sit back and shut the hell up. For the next decade or so, no man will be allowed to hold any type of elected office. Let the women run the world, and meanwhile we'll all work on becoming more enlightened.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 15, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Well the show was supposed to focus on the boys. Hence the name "The Chipmunks".

I know that, but it was a big thing in cartoons at the time because people thought it was cute. THAT'S my point.
Reply
:iconcedarwoods:
CedarWoods Featured By Owner Jul 15, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I get you. What I'm proposing is a spinoff show called "The Chipettes" that mainly focuses on the girls, with the boys as supporting characters. It will probably never happen, but it is a nice thought.
Reply
:iconsimonsevilleforever:
simonsevilleforever Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
I don't mind the cgi or the cartoon version. When i was 10ish 11ish i saw the 1st movie for the first time and that's how i imagined Alvin, Simon, and Theodore and then in the 2nd that's how i imagined the Chipettes. But then I got introduced to the cartoon and I was stunned by how different they are, and I was kind of disappointed. I actually thought their parents were hippies until I saw the chipmunk reunion and I was like WTF!!! why did they changed it!!!. I might not have grown up with the cartoon chipmunks but im a little bit mad about what they did. But I don't really care as much they are cute and fun to watch in any version :).
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I hadn't seen much of the cartoon until I saw CGI either. The cartoon is much better.
Reply
:iconsimonsevilleforever:
simonsevilleforever Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist Writer
I love both cgi and cartoon
Reply
:iconchipmunkfan01:
Chipmunkfan01 Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Oh wow.... well... I agree with you, even in the three cgi movies, facts arent straight with one thing, simon can swim in a 12 ft. pool in the first one, can't swim in a 2 in toilet water, but he can swim in a hundered some od foot river? now that doesn't make any sense.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Yeah, they do have a bunch of little things like that. In fact, in the 60s there was a book written that said Simon couldn't swim at all.
Reply
:iconchipmunkfan01:
Chipmunkfan01 Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Lovley... it took 47 years to learn... then lost it in 2 then REGAINED it in 3... I don't think its ran by the Badgasarian Family anymore :/
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
It's still run by them, they just...have a lot of "help". -_-
Reply
:iconchipmunkfan01:
Chipmunkfan01 Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
"help" my ass, they are in an office building while they have paid asses think of "good Ideas". There is no love or effort in it anymore, even [I(bold)] Said that the third dic was ABSOLUTELY ATROCIOUS!there is like 2 songs if that that I like..... at least in the first one, they had Good music, they don't even have any chipmunk or chipette singing in a song in the third one.But I still like 80's/90's better, they are more human and had fun times. there could be more art done in 90's than 21st century....
Reply
:icontdzaleski:
tdzaleski Featured By Owner Jul 10, 2012  Student General Artist
Yea, I have to agree with you on that one. While being a cartoon fan myself, I didn't exactly mind the first two movies. The third one though, I created a IMDB account just to bash it. And I'm scared as to what will happen for the 4th...

I just wish they would actually bring back Miss Miller. I know that Dody has died, but they can still have someone play her. It just doesn't fit with the Chipmunks and ettes living together.
Reply
:iconkaylahasswagg123:
Kaylahasswagg123 Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012
Hay DeadlyNova i watch your thing on youtube cute i know why they changed it because they wanted it to be more in style but it does look crappy but i still like both styles but they need to change the personalities they are like more female versions of the chipmunks and like you said they are not. They need to stop turning the cartoons we know and love into CGI crap. I mean everytime they make some movie bout some cartoon in the 80's they now have to make it into CGI what is up with that.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Yeah..
Reply
:iconsalacberry:
Salacberry Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
I like both versions too, mainly because I was introduced to the chipmunks by the first CGI movie. But I definitely agree with these points. They didn't have to change the eye colours or personalities. The cartoon chipmunks were fine as they were and I don't know why their personalities had to be butchered in the CGI.

I wasn't really an Eleanor fan after watching the Squeakquel because they made her out to be a female Theodore, and I can't really relate with CGI Theodore's personality. But afterwards I watched the cartoon movies and episodes and fell in love with her personality. I'm really disappointed that they ruined her like that in the CGI. She had so much character in the cartoon, and I would have loved to see her tough side in Chipwrecked. But no, she sprained her ankle and wet herself.

I'm not going to lie, I am a fan of the CGI designs. But the CGI movies are more screwed up than people realise. I really wish they didn't mess with the chipmunks' personalities and backstories. I want to encourage people to watch the cartoon... I know that many CGI fans are stubborn as hell, but I'm sure they'll love the classic chipmunks and fall in love with their proper personalities like I did.
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
I was pretty much introduced through the CGI, but that doesn't change the fact that I despise them. xD

Yeah. :( Eleanor was the worst off, definitely. She was so pathetic in the CGI movies. -_-

They are stubborn, yeah. :(
Reply
:iconsalacberry:
Salacberry Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist Digital Artist
Haha. xD

It's such a shame. I wonder why they changed everything.... Did they somehow think that it would be better for little kids? :/
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 9, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
No clue. -_- I wish they hadn't.
Reply
:iconalvinsbellybutton:
AlvinsBellyButton Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2012
80s an 90s alvin is so fat an cute

hes actualy fatter than theodore :D
dont u just wanna hug him <33
Reply
:icondeadlynova:
DeadlyNova Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2012  Hobbyist General Artist
Uh....he isn't actually...in very old episodes they are about the same size and in the mid to later ones Alvin is much thinner...
Reply
:iconalvinsbellybutton:
AlvinsBellyButton Featured By Owner Jul 8, 2012
im sure he is more fat than theodore

srsly

have u seen him shirtles?

my friend said he wants to bear hug early 80s alvin while alvin is in a tux

cute huh?
Reply
Add a Comment:
 
×

:icondeadlynova: More from DeadlyNova


Featured in Collections

Fanfiction and Other Writings by BoredStupid100




Details

Submitted on
July 5, 2012
Link
Thumb

Stats

Views
1,919
Favourites
13 (who?)
Comments
169
×